El estatus científico de las técnicas proyectivas

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ackerman, S.J., Clemence, A.J., Weatherill, R. & Hilsenroth, M.J. (1999). Use of the TAT in the assessment of DSM-IV Cluster B personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 422–448.
• Ackerman, M.J., & Ackerman, M.C. (1997). Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 137–145.
• Acklin, M.W. (1999). Behavioral science foundations of the Rorschach test: Research and clinical applications. Assessment, 6, 319–326.
• Acklin, M.W., McDowell, C.J., Verschell, M.S., & Chan, D. (2000). Interobserver agreement, intraobserver reliability, and the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 15–47.
• Adair, H.E., & Wagner, E.E. (1992). Stability of unusual verbalizations on the Rorschach for outpatients with schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 250–256.
• Adler, P.T. (1952). Evaluation of the figure drawing technique: Reliability, factorial structure, and diagnostic usefulness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 52–57.
• Aiken, L.R. (1996). Personality assessment: Methods and practices. Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber.
• Aldridge, N.C. (1998). Strengths and limitations of forensic child sexual abuse interviews with anatomical dolls: An empirical review. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 20, 1–41.
• American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
• American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.
• Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing. NY: MacMillan.
• Anderson, J.W. (1999). Henry A. Murray and the creation of the Thematic Apperception Test. In L. Geiser & M.I. Stein (Eds.), Evocative Images: The Thematic Apperception Test and the art of projection (pp. 23–38).Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
• Arnold, M.B. (1962). Story sequence analysis. NY: Columbia University Press.
• Archer, R.P. (1999). Introduction to a special section: Perspectives on the Rorschach. Assessment, 6, 307–311.
• Archer, R.P., & Krishnamurthy, R. (1993a). Combining the Rorschach and the MMPI in the assessment of adolescents. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 132–140.
• Archer, R.P., & Krishnamurthy, R. (1993b). A review of MMPI and Rorschach interrelationships in adult samples. Journal of Personality Assessment,61, 277–293.
• Archer, R.P., & Krishnamurthy, R. (1997). MMPI-A and Rorschach indices related to depression and conduct disorder: An evaluation of the incremental validity hypothesis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 517– 533.
• Aronow, E., & Reznikoff, M. (1973). Attitudes toward the Rorschach test expressed in book reviews: A historical perspective. Journal of Personality Assessment, 37, 309–315.
• Aronow, E. & Reznikoff, M. (1976). Rorschach content interpretation. NY: Grune & Stratton.
• Aronow, E., Reznikoff, M., & Moreland, K. (1995). The Rorschach: Projective technique or psychometric test? Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 213–228.
• Aylward, E., Walker, E., & Bettes, B. (1984). Intelligence in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10, 430–459.
• Ball, J.D., Archer, R.P., & Imhof, E.A. (1994). Time requirements of psychological testing: A survey of practitioners. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 239–249.
• Barends, A., Westen, D., Byers, S., Leigh, J., & Silbert, D. (1990). Assessing affect-tone of relationship paradigms from TAT and interview data. Psychological Assessment, 2, 329–332.
• Bellak, L. (1975). The T.A.T., C.A.T., and S.A.T. in clinical use (3rd ed.), NY: Grune & Stratton.
• Beyerstein, B.L., & Beyerstein, D.F. (1992). The Write Stuff: Evaluations of graphology − the study of handwriting analysis. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
• Bilett, J.L., Jones, N.F., & Whitaker, L.C. (1982). Exploring schizophrenic thinking in older adolescents with the WAIS, Rorschach, and WIST. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 232–243.
• Blatt, S.J., Wein, S.J., Chevron, E.S., & Quinlan, D.M. (1979). Parental representatives and depression in normal young adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 388–397.
• Blum, G.S. (1950). The Blacky Pictures: Manual of Instructions. NY: Psychological Corporation.
• Board of Professional Affairs (1998). Awards for distinguished professional contributions: John Exner. American Psychologist, 53, 391–392.
• Bornstein, R.F. (1996). Construct validity of the Rorschach Oral Dependency Scale: 1967–1995. Psychological Assessment, 8, 200–205.
• Bornstein, R.F. (1999). Criterion validity of objective and projective dependency tests: A meta-analytic assessment of behavioral prediction. Psychological Assessment, 11, 48–57.
• Borstellmann, L.J., & Klopfer, W.G. (1953). The Szondi Test: A review and critical evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 112–132.
• Boscan, D.C. (2000). The Rorschach test: A Mexican sample using the Comprehensive System. (Doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute, 1999).Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 4285B.
• Browning, D.L. (1986). Psychiatric ward behavior and length of stay in adolescent and young adult inpatients: A developmental approach to prediction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 227–230.
• Bruhn, A.R. (1992). The Early Memories Procedure: A projective test of autobiographical memory: I. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 1–15.
• Buck, J.N. (1964). The House-Tree-Person manual supplement. Beverly Hills, CA: Western Psychological Services.
• Burns, R.C. (1987). Kinetic-House-Tree Person Drawings (K-H-T-P): An interpretive manual. NY: Bruner-Mazel.
• Bursik, K. (1991). Adaptation to divorce and ego development in adult women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 300–306.
• Butcher, J.N., Nezami, E., & Exner, J.E. (1998). Psychological assessment of people in diverse cultures. In S.S. Kazarian & D.R. Evans (Eds.), Cultural Clinical Psychology (pp. 61–105). NY: Oxford University Press.
• Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
• Caplehorn, W.F., & Sutton, A.J. (1965). Need achievement and its relation to school performance, anxiety, and intelligence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 17, 44–51.
• Carlson, K., Quinlan, D., Tucker, G., & Harrow, M. (1973). Body disturbance and sexual elaboration factors in figure drawings of schizophrenic patients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 37, 56–63.
• Cattell, R.B. (1957). Personality and motivation: Structure and measurement. NY: World Book Company.
• Chapman, L.J., & Chapman, J.P. (1967). Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 193–204.
• Chapman, L.J., & Chapman, J.P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 271–280.
• Chase, D.A. (1987). An analysis of Human Figure and Kinetic Family Drawings of sexually abused children and adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48 (2A), 338.
• Cochrane, C.T. (1972). Effects of diagnostic information on empathic under- standing by the therapist in a psychotherapy analogue. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 359–365.
• Coleman, M.J., Carpenter, J.T., Warenaux, C., Levy, D.L., Shenton, M.E., Perry, J., Medoff, D., Wong, H., Monach, D., Meyer, P., O’Brian, C., Valentino, C., Robinson, D., Smith, M., Makowski, D., & Holzman, P.S. (1993). The Thought Disorder Index: A reliability study. Psychological Assessment, 5, 336–342.
• Conger, A.J., & Jackson, D.N. (1972). Suppressor variables, prediction, and the interpretation of psychological relationships. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 579–599.
• Cooper, H., DeNeve, K., & Charlton, K. (1997). Finding the missing science: The fate of studies submitted for review by a human subjects committee. Psychological Methods, 2, 447–452.
• Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1993). Ego development and trait models of personality. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 20–23.
• Costello, R.M. (1998). Psychometric definition of Rorschach determinant component structure. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 116–123.
• Craddick, R. (1961). Size of Santa Claus drawings as a function of time before and after Christmas. Journal of Psychological Studies, 12, 121–125.
• Cramer, P. (1991). The development of defense mechanisms: Theory, research, and assessment. NY: Springer-Verlag.
• Cramer, P. (1999). Ego functions and ego development: Defense mechanisms and intelligence as predictors of ego level. Journal of Personality, 67, 735–760.
• Cramer, P. (1999). Future directions for the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72, 74–92.
• Cramer, P. & Block, J. (1998). Preschool antecedents of defense mechanism use in young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 159–169.
• Cramer, P., & Gaul, R. (1988). The effects of success and failure on children’s use of defense mechanisms. Journal of Personality, 56, 729–742.
• Cressen, R. (1975). Artistic quality of drawings and judges’ evaluations of the DAP. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 132–137.
• Cronbach, L.J., & Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
• Currie, S.F., Holtzman, W.H., & Swartz, J.D. (1974). Early indicators of personality traits viewed retrospectively. Journal of School Psychology, 12, 51–59.
• Cvetkovic, R. (1979). Conception and representation of space in human figure drawings by schizophrenic and normal subjects. J_ournal of Personality Assessment_, 43, 247–256.
• Dana, R.H. (1955). Clinical diagnosis and objective TAT scoring. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20, 33–36.
• Dana, R.H. (1993). Multicultural assessment perspectives for professional psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Dana, R.H. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of cross-cultural and multicultural personality assessment. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993).
• Dawes, R.M. (1993). Prediction of the future versus an understanding of the past: A basic assymetry. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 1–24.
• Dawes, R.M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: The Free Press.
• Dawes, R.M. (1999). Two methods for studying the incremental validity of a Rorschach variable. Psychological Assessment, 11, 297–302.
• Dawes, R.M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P.E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668–1674.
• Depue, R.A., & Collins, P.F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569.
• Dodge, K.A., & Frame, C.L. (1982). Social cognitive deficits and biases in aggressive boys. Child Development, 53, 8–22.
• Dodge, K.A., Murphy, R.R., & Buchsbaum, K. (1984). The assessment of intention-cue detection skills in children: Implications for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 163–173.
• Dollinger, S., & Cramer, P. (1990). Children’s defensive responses and emotional upset following a disaster: A projective assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 116–127.
• Dosajh, N.L. (1996). Projective techniques with particular reference to inkblot tests. Journal of Projective Psychology and Mental Health, 3, 59–68.
• Drachnik, C. (1994). The tongue as a graphic symbol of sexual abuse. Art Therapy, 11, 58–61.
• Dudley, H.K., Craig, E.M., Mason, M., & Hirsch, S.M. (1976). Drawings of the opposite sex: Continued use of the Draw-A-Person test and young state hospital patients. Journal of Adolescence, 5, 201–219.
• Durand, V.M., Blanchard, E.B., & Mindell, J.A. (1988). Training in projective testing: A survey of clinical training directors and internship directors. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 236–238.
• Emmons, R.A., & McAdams, D.P. (1991). Personal strivings and motive dispositions: Exploring the links. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 648–654.
• Entwisle, D.R. (1972). To dispel fantasies about fantasy-based measures of achievement motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 377–391.
• Epstein, S. (1979). The stability of behavior: I. On predicting more of the people most of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097–1126.
• Eron, L. (1950). A normative study of the TAT. Psychological Monographs, 64 (Whole No. 315).
• Erstad, D. (1996). An investigation of older adults’ less frequent human movement and color responses on the Rorschach (Doctoral dissertation, Marquette University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 4084B.
• Exner, J.E. (1969). The Rorschach systems. New York: Grune & Stratton. Exner, J.E. (1974). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. Volume 1. NY:Wiley.
• Exner, J.E. (1986). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System . Volume 1 . Volume 1: Basic Foundations (2nd ed.). NY: Wiley.
• Exner, J.E. (1989). Searching for projection in the Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 520–536.
• Exner, J.E. (1991). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. Volume 2: Interpretation (2nd ed.). NY: Wiley.
• Exner, J.E. (1992). Some comments on “A conceptual critique of the EA: comparison in the Comprehensive Rorschach System.” Psychological Assessment, 4, 297–300.
• Exner, J.E. (1993). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. Volume 1: Basic Foundations (3rd ed.). NY: Wiley.
• Exner, J.E. (1995). Comment on “Narcissism in the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach.” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 200–206. Exner, J.E. (1996). A comment on “The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A critical examination.” Psychological Science, 7, 11–13.
• Exner, J.E. & Weiner, I.B. (1995). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. Volume 3: Assessment of children and adolescents (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
• Feldman, M., & Hunt, R.G. (1958). A relation of difficulty in drawing and ratings of adjustment based on human figure drawings. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 22, 217–220.
• Fineman, S. (1977). The achievement motive and its measurement. Where are we now? British Journal of Psychology, 68, 1–22.
• Finn, S.E. (1996). Manual for using the MMPI-2 as a therapeutic intervention. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Finn, S.E., & Tonsager, M.E. (1992). Therapeutic effects of providing MMPI-2 test feedback to college students awaiting therapy. Psychological Assessment, 4, 278–287.
• Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2 Wiley.ed). NY.
• Fosberg, I.A. (1938). Rorschach reactions under varied conditions. Rorschach Research Exchange, 3, 12–20.
• Fosberg, I.A. (1941). An experimental study of the reliability of the Rorschach psychodiagnostic technique. Rorschach Research Exchange, 5, 72–84.
• Frank, L.K. (1948). Projective methods. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas.
• Frank, G. (1976). On the validity of hypotheses derived from the Rorschach: I. The relationship between color and affect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 411–427.
• Frank, G. (1978). On the validity of hypotheses derived from the Rorschach: III. The relationship between shading and anxiety. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 531–538.
• Frank, G. (1979a). On the validity of hypotheses derived from the Rorschach: V. The relationship between form level and ego strength. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 375–384.
• Frank, G. (1979b). On the validity of hypotheses derived from the Rorschach: VI. M and the intrapsychic life of individuals. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 1267–1277.
• Frank, G. (1980). New directions in Rorschach research: I. The process eactive differentiation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 187–191.
• Frank, G. (1993a). C’ and depression. Psychological Reports, 72, 1184–1186.
• Frank, G. (1993b). On the meaning of movement responses on the Rorschach. Psychological Reports, 73, 1219–1225.
• Frank, G. (1993c). On the validity of hypotheses derived from the Rorschach: The relationship between color and affect, update 1992. Psychological Reports, 73, 12–14.
• Frank, G. (1993d). On the validity of hypotheses derived from the Rorschach: The relationship between shading and anxiety, update 1992. Psychological Reports, 72, 519–522.
• Frank, G. (1993e). On the validity of Rorschach’s hypotheses: The relationship of space responses (S) to oppositionalism. Psychological Reports, 72, 1111–1114.
• Frank, G. (1993f). Use of the Rorschach to predict whether a person would benefit from psychotherapy. Psychological Reports, 73, 1155–1163.
• Frank, G. (1994a). On form level on the Rorschach. Psychological Reports, 75, 315–320.
• Frank, G. (1994b). On the prediction of aggressive behavior from the Rorschach. Psychological Reports, 75, 183–191.
• Frank, G. (1994c). On the prediction of suicide from the Rorschach. Psychological Reports, 74, 787–794.
• Frank, G. (1997). Research assessment of the clinical utility of the Rorschach. Psychological Reports, 81, 1255–1258.
• Freud, S. (1911). On the mechanism of paranoia. In S. Freud, General Psychological Theory: Papers on Metapsychology. NY: Collier Books.
• Frueh, B.C., Leverett, J.P., & Kinder, B.N. (1995). Interrelationship between MMPI-2 and Rorschach variables in a sample of Vietnam veterans with PTSD. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 312–318.
• Gadol, I. (1969). The incremental and predictive validity of the Rorschach test in personality assessment of normal, neurotic, and psychotic subjects. Dissertation Abstracts, 29, 3482-B (University Microfilms No. 69-4469).
• Gann, M.K. (1995). The Rorschach and other projective methods. In Jay Ziskin (Ed.), Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony. Vol. II: Special topics (5th ed.) (pp. 823–884). Los Angeles, CA: Law and Psychology Press.
• Gallucci, N.T. (1990). On the synthesis of information from psychological tests. Psychological Reports, 67, 1243–1260.
• Garb, H.N. (1984). The incremental validity of information used in personality assessment. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 641–655.
• Garb, H.N. (1989). Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 387–396.
• Garb, H.N. (1998a). Recommendations for training in the use of the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 621–622.
• Garb, H.N. (1998b). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
• Garb, H.N. (1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment, 6, 313–315.
• Garb, H.N., Florio, C.M., & Grove, W.M. (1998). The validity of the Rorschach and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Results from meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 9, 402–404.
• Garb, H.N., Florio, C.M., & Grove, W.M. (1999). The Rorschach controversy: reply to Parker, Hunsley, and Hanson. Psychological Science, 10, 293–294.
• Garb, H.N., Wood, J.M., & Lilienfeld, S.O. (2000). The detection and assessment of child sexual abuse: An evaluation of the Rorschach, Thematic Apperception Test, and projective drawings. Manuscript in preparation.
• Garb, H.N., Wood, J.M., & Nezworski, M.T. (2000). Projective techniques and the detection of child sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 5, 161–168.
• Garb, H.N., Wood, J.M., & Nezworski, M.T., Grove, W.M., & Stejskal, W.J. (in press). Towards a resolution of the Rorschach controversy. Psychological Assessment.
• Gittelman Klein, R. (1986). Questioning the clinical usefulness of projective psychological tests for children. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 378–382.
• Glass, M.H., Bieber, S.L., & Tkachuk, M.J. (1996). Personality styles and dynamics of Alaska native and nonnative incarcerated men. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 583–603.
• Gluck, M.R. (1955). The relationships between hostility in the TAT and behavioral hostility. Journal of Projective Techniques, 19, 21–26.
• Golden, M. (1964). Some effects of combining psychological tests on clinical inferences. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 440–446.
• Scott O. Lilienfeld, James M. Wood, and Howard N. Garb Grobstein, G. (1996). Human Figure Drawings and the identification of child sexual abuse. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(8A), 339.
• Gronnerod, C. (1999). Rorschach interrater agreement estimates: An empirical evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 115–120.
• Groth-Marnat, G. (1984). Handbook of psychological assessment. NY : V an Nostrand Reinhold. Groth-Marnat, G. (1997). Handbook of psychological assessment (3rd ed.). NY: Wiley.
• Groth-Marnat, G., & Roberts, L. (1998). Human figure drawings and House Tree Person drawings as indicators of self-esteem: A quantitative approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 219–222.
• Grove, W.M. (Chair). APA Division 12 (Clinical) Presidential Task Force “Assessment for the Year 2000.” Report of the Task Force. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, Division 12 (Clinical Psychology).
• Grove, W.M., & Barden, R.C. (1999). Protecting the integrity of the legal system: The admissibility of testimony from mental health experts, under Daubert/Kumho analyses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 224– 242.
• Gutin, N.J. (1997). Differential object representations in inpatients with narcissistic and borderline personality disorders and normal controls. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58 (03-B), 1532.
• Halperin, K., & Snyder, C.R. (1979). Effects of enhanced psychological test feedback on treatment outcome: Therapeutic implications of the Barnum effect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 140–146.
• Hamel, M., Shaffer, T.W., & Erdberg, P. (2000). A study of nonpatient pre-adolescent Rorschach protocols. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 280–294.
• Hammer, E.F. (1958). The clinical application of figure drawings. Springer, IL: C.G. Thomas.
• Hammer, E.F. (1959). Critique of Swensen’s “Empirical evaluation of human figure drawings.” Journal of Projective Techniques, 23, 30–32.
• Hammer, E.F. (1968). The clinical application of projective drawings. Springfield, IL.: Thomas.
• Handler, L., & Habernicht, D. (1994). The Kinetic Family Drawing: A review of the literature. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 440–464.
• Handler, L., & Reyher, J. (1965). Figure drawing anxiety indices: A review of the literature. Journal of Projective Techniques, 29, 305–313.
• Hauser, S.T. (1976). Loevinger’s model and measure of ego development: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 928–995.
• Hayes, S.C., Nelson, R.O., & Jarrett, R.B. (1987). The treatment utility of assessment: A functional approach to evaluating treatment quality. American Psychologist, 42, 963–974.
• Hayslip, B., Lowman, R.L. (1986). The clinical use of projective techniques with the aged: A critical review and synthesis. Clinical Gerontologist, 5, 63–94.
• Heilbrun, K. (1992). The role of psychological testing in forensic assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 257–272.
• Hibbard, S., Farmer, L., Wells, C., Difillipo, E., Barry, W., Korman, R., & Sloan, P. (1994). Validation of Cramer’s Defense Mechanism Manual for the TAT. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 197–210.
• Hiler, E.W., & Nesvig, D. (1965). An evaluation of criteria used by clinicians to infer pathology from figure drawings. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 520–529.
• Hiller, J.B., Rosenthal, R., Bornstein, R.F., Berry, D.T.R. Brunell-Neuleib, S.(1999). A comparative meta–analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment, 11, 278–296.
• Holaday, M., Smith, D.A., & Sherry, A. (2000). Sentence completion tests: A review of the literature and results of a survey of members of the Society for Personality Assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 371– 385.
• Holmes, D.S. (1974). The conscious control of thematic projection. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 323–329.
• Holmes, D.S. (1978). Projection as a defense mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 677–688.
• Holtzman, W.H. (1980). Projective techniques. In H.C. Triandis & J.W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Methodology. Volume 2 (pp. 245–278). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Holtzman, W.H., Thorpe, J.S., Swartz, J.D., & Herron, E.W. (1961). Inkblot perception and personality. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
• Horowitz, M.J. (1962). A study of clinicians’ judgments from projective test protocols. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 251–256.
• Hundal, P.S., & Jerath, J.M. (1972). Correlates of projective measures of achievement motivation and their factorial structure. Indian Journal of Psychology, 47, 15–27.
• Hunsley, J., & Bailey, J.M. (1999). The clinical utility of the Rorschach: Unfulfilled promises and an uncertain future. Psychological Assessment, 11, 266–277.
• Hunsley, J., & Bailey, J.M. (in press). Whither the Rorschach? An analysis of the evidence. Psychological Assessment.
• Hunsley, J., Lee, C., & Wood, J.M. (in press). Controversial and questionable assessment techniques. In S.O. Lilienfeld, J.M. Lohr, & S.J. Lynn (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in contemporary clinical psychology. NY: Guilford.
• Jackson, D.N. (1971). The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. Psychological Review, 78, 229–248.
• Jackson, D.N. (1993). Personality development and nonlinear measurement models. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 30–33.
• Jensen, A.R. (1965). A review of the Rorschach. In O.K. Buros (Ed.), Sixth mental measurements handbook (pp. 501–509). Highland Park, New Hampshire: Gryphon.
• Joiner, T.E., & Schmidt, K.L. (1997). Drawing conclusions − or not from drawings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 476–481.
• Joiner, T.E., Schmidt, K.L., & Barnett, J. (1996). Size, detail, and line heaviness in children’s drawings as correlates of emotional distress: (More) negative evidence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 127–141.
• Johnson, B. (1989). DSTAT: Software for the meta-analytic review of research literature Computer program . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Johnston, M., & Holzman, P.S. (1979). Assessing schizophrenic thinking. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Jolley, R.P. (1995). Children’s production and perception of visual metaphors for mood and emotion in line drawings and in art. Doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
• Jorgensen, K., Andersen, T.J., & Dam, H. (2000).The diagnostic efficiency of the Rorschach Depression Index and the Schizophrenia Index: A review. Assessment, 7, 259–280.
• Kagan, J. (1956). The measurement of overt aggression from fantasy. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 390–393.
• Kahill, S. (1984). Human figure drawing in adults: An update of the empirical evidence, 1967–1982. Canadian Psychology, 25, 269–292.
• Kamphaus, R.W., & Pleiss, K.L. (1991). Draw-a-Person techniques: Tests in search of a construct. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 395–401.
• Kaplan, B. (1961). Cross-cultural use of projective techniques. In F.L.K. Hsu (Ed.), Psychological Anthropology (pp. 235–254). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
• Karon, B.P. (1978). Projective tests are valid. American Psychologist, 33, 764–765.
• Karon, B.P., & O’Grady, P. (1970). Quantified judgments of mental health from the Rorschach, TAT, and clinical status interview by means of a scaling technique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 229–235.
• Katz, H.E., Russ, S.W., & Overholser, J.C. (1993). Sex differences, sex roles, and projection on the TAT: Matching stimulus to examinee gender. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 186–191.
• Keiser, R.E., & Prather, E.N. (1990). What is the TAT? A review of ten years of research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 800–803.
• Kinder, B.N. (1992). The problems of R in clinical settings and in research: Suggestions for the future. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 252– 259.
• Kleiger, J.H. (1992). A conceptual critique of the EA:es comparison in the Comprehensive Rorschach System. Psychological Assessment, 4, 288– 296.
• Klineberg, O. (1980). Historical perspectives: Cross-cultural psychology before 1960. In H.C. Triandis & W.W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of cross- cultural psychology. Perspectives. Volume 1 (pp. 31–67). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Klopfer, W.F., & Taulbee, E. (1976). Projective tests. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 543–567.
• Knoff, H.M., & Prout, H.T. (1985). The Kinetic Drawing System: A review and integration of the Kinetic Family and School Drawing Techniques. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 50–59.
• Kohlberg, L. (1981). The meaning and measurement of moral development. Worchester, MA.: Clark University Press.
• Koocher, G.P., Goodman, G.S., White, C.S., Friedrich, W.N., Sivan, A.B., & Reynolds, C.R. (1995). Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed in child sexual-abuse assessments. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 119–222.
• Koppitz, E.M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawing. NY: Grune & Stratton.
• Kostlan, A. (1954). A method for the empirical study of psychodiagnosis. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 18, 83–88.
• Kraiger, K., Hakel, M.D., & Cornelius, E.T. (1984). Exploring fantasies of TAT reliability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 365–370.
• Krall, V., Sachs, H., Lazar, B., Rayson, B., Growe, G., Novar, L., & O’Connell, L. (1983). Rorschach norms for inner city children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 155–157.
• Kroon, N., Goudena, P.P., & Rispens, J. (1998). Thematic Apperception Tests for child and adolescent assessment: A practitioner’s consumer guide. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16, 99–117.
• Kubiszyn, T.W., Meyer, G.J., Finn, S.E., Eyde, L.D., Kay, G.G., Moreland, K.L., Dies, R.R., & Eisman, E.J. (2000). Empirical support for psycho- logical assessment in clinical health care settings. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 119–130.
• Lambert, H.V. (1972). A comparison of Jane Loevinger’s theory of ego development and Lawrence Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
• Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
• Lees-Haley, P.R. (1992). Psychodiagnostic test usage by forensic psychologists. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 10, 25–30.
• Levenberg, S.B. (1975). Professional training, psychodiagnostic skill, and Kinetic Family Drawings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 389–393.
• Levy, L.H. (1963). Psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
• Lewinsohn, P.M. (1964). Relationship between height of figure drawing and depression in psychiatric patients, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11,49–54.
• Lilienfeld, S.O. (1999). Projective measures of personality and psychopathology: How well do they work? Skeptical Inquirer, 23, 32–39.
• Lilienfeld, S.O., Hess, T., & Rowland, C. (1996). Psychopathic personality traits and temporal perspective: A test of short time horizon hypothesis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 18, 285–314. Lindzey, G. (1959). On the classification of projective techniques. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 158–168.
• Lipsey, M.W. (1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
• Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.
• Little, K.B., & Schneidman, E.S. (1959). Congruencies among interpretations of psychological test and anamnestic data. Psychological Monographs (6,Whole No. 476).
• Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.
• Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Loevinger, J. (1987). Paradigms of personality. NY: W.H. Freeman. Loevinger, J. (1993). Measurement of personality: True or false. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 1–16.
• Loevinger, J. (1998). Technical foundations for measuring ego development:The Washington University Sentence Completion Test. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
• Lowenstein, L.F. (1987). Are projective techniques dead? British Journal of Projective Psychology, 32, 2–21.
• Lucas, R.H. (1971). Validation of a test of ego development by means of a standardized interview (Doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis). Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 2204B.
• Luscher, M., & Scott, I. (1969). The Luscher Color Test. NY: Washington Square Press.
• Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas
• Magnussen, N.G. (1960). Verbal and non-verbal reinforcers in the Rorschach situation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16, 167–169.
• Malik, R. (1992). An exploration of object relations phenomena in borderline personality disorder. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52 (09B), 4962.
• Masling, J. (1960). The influence of situational and interpersonal variables in projective testing. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 65–85.
• Masling, J. (1966). Role-related behavior of the subject and psychologist and its effect upon psychological data. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 67–104). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
• Masling, J. (1997). On the nature and utility of projective tests. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 257–270.
• Masling, J.M., Rabie, L., & Blondheim, S.H. (1967). Obesity, level of aspiration, and Rorschach and TAT measures of oral dependence. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 233–239.
• McArthur, D.S., & Roberts, G.E. (1990). Roberts Apperception Test for Children manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
• McCann, J.T. (1998). Defending the Rorschach in court: An analysis of admissibility using legal and professional standards. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 125–144.
• McClelland, D.C. (1951). Personality. NY: William Sloane Associates.
• McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
• McClelland, D.C. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merits of operant and respondent measures. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 10–41.
• McClelland, D.C. (1989). Motivational factors in health and illness. American Psychologist, 44, 219–233.
• McClelland, D.C., Atkinson, J.W., Clark, R.A., & Lowell, E.L. (1953). The achievement motive. NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• McClelland, D.C., & Boyatsis, R.E. (1982). Leadership motive pattern and long-term success in management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67,737–743.
• McClelland, D.C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do selfattributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.
• McClelland, D.C., Ross, G., & Patel, V.T. (1985). The effect of an examination on salivary norepinephrine and immunoglobulin levels. Journal of Human Stress, 11, 52–59.
• McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1980). Openness to experiencee and ego level in Loevinger’s sentence completion test: Dispositional contributions in developmental models of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1179–1190.
• McKinzey, R.K. & Ziegler, T. (1999). Challenging a flexible neuropsychological battery under Kelly/Frye: A case study. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 543–551.
• McNally, R.J. (1996). Cognitive bias in the anxiety disorders. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 43, 211–250.
• Meehl, P.E. (1945). The dynamics of “structured” personality tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1, 296–303.
• Meehl, P.E. (1959). Some ruminations on the validation of clinical procedures. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 102–128.
• Meehl, P.E. (1986). Diagnostic taxa as open concepts: Metatheoretical and statistical questions about reliability and construct validity in the grand strategy of nosological revision. In T. Millon & G. Klerman (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Toward the DSM-IV (pp. 215–231). NY: Guilford.
• Meehl, P.E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 194–216.
• Meloy, J.R., & Gacono, C.B. (1995). Assessing the psychopathic personality. In J.N. Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment (pp.410–422). NY: Oxford University Press.
• Meloy, J.R., & Gacono, C.B. (1998). The internal world of the psychopath. In T. Millon, E. Simonsen, M. Birket-Smith, & R.D. Davis (Eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior (pp. 95–109). NY: Guilford Press.
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.
• Meyer, G.J. (1991). An empirical search for fundamental personality and mood dimensions within the Rorschach test (Unpublished dissertation. Loyola University of Chicago, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1071B-1072B.
• Meyer, G.J. (1992a). Response frequency problems in the Rorschach: Clinical and research implications with suggestions for the future. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 231–244.
• Meyer, G.J. (1992b). The Rorschach’s factor structure: A contemporary investigation and historical review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 117–136.
• Meyer, G.J. (1993). The impact of response frequency on the Rorschach constellation indices and on their validity with diagnostic and MMPI-2 criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 153–180.
• Meyer, G.J. (1996). The Rorschach and MMPI: Toward a more scientifically differentiated understanding of cross-method assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 558–578.
• Meyer, G.J. (1997a). Assessing reliability: Critical corrections for a critical examination of the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Psychological Assessment, 9, 480–489.
• Meyer, G.J. (1997b). Thinking clearly about reliability: More critical corrections regarding the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Psychological Assessment, 9, 495–498.
• Meyer, G.J. (2000a). The incremental validity of the Rorschach Prognostic Rating Scale over the MMPI Ego Strength Scale and IQ. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 356–370.
• Meyer, G.J. (2000b). On the science of Rorschach research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 46–81.
• Meyer, G.J., Finn, S.E., Eyde, L.D., Kay, G.G., Kubiszyn, T.W., Moreland, K.L., Eisman, E.J., & Dies, R.R. (1998). Benefits and costs of psycho- logical assessment in healthcare delivery: Report of the Board of Professional Affairs Psychological Assessment Work Group, Part I. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Meyer, G.J., & Handler, L. (1997). The ability of the Rorschach to predict subsequent outcome: A meta-analysis of the Rorschach Prognostic Rat- ing Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 1–38.
• Morgan, C.D., & Murray, H.A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 34, 289–304.
• Motta, R.W., Little, S.G., & Tobin, M.I. (1993). The use and abuse of human figure drawings. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 162–169.
• Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in personality. NY: Oxford University Press.
• Murstein, B.T., & Easter, L.V. (1965).The role of achievement motive, anxiety, stimulus, and expectancy, on achievement motivation in arithmetic and thematic tests. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 29, 491–497.
• Murstein, B.I., & Mathes, S. (1996). Projection on projective techniques ?pathology: The problem that is not being addressed. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 337–349.
• Mussen, P.H., & Naylor, H.K. (1954). The relationships between overt and fantasy aggression. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49,235–240.
• Naglieri, J.A. (1988). Draw A Person: A Quantitative Scoring System. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
• Naglieri, J.A. (1992). Review of the Hutt Adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt Test. In J.J. Kramer & J.C. Conoley (Eds.), The Eleventh Mental Mea- surements Yearbook (pp. 103–104). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
• Naglieri, J.A., McNeish, T.J., & Bardos, A.N. (1991). Draw-A-Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance. Austin, TX: ProEd.
• Naglieri, J.A., & Pfeiffer, S.I. (1992). Performance of disruptive behavior- disordered and normal samples on the Draw-A-Person: Screening Procedure for Emotional Disturbance. Psychological Assessment, 4, 156– 159.
• Nakata, L.M. (1999). Interrater reliability and the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: Clinical and non-clinical protocols (Doctoral dissertation, Pacific Graduate School of Psychology). Dissertation Abstracts International.
• Newman, D.L., Tellegen, A., & Bouchard, T.J. (1998). Individual differences in adult ego development: Sources of influence in twins reared apart. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 985–995.
• Nezworski, M.T., & Wood, J.M. (1995). Narcissism in the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 179–199.
• Nichols, R.C., & Strumpfer, D.J. (1962). A factor analysis of Draw-a-Person test scores. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 156–161.
• Oberlander, L.B. (1995). Psycholegal issues in child sexual abuse evaluations: A survey of forensic mental health professionals. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 475–490.
• O’Connell, M., Cooper, S., Perry, J.C., & Hoke, L. (1989). The relationship between thought disorder and psychotic symptoms in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 273–278.
• Ordnuff, S.R., Freedenfeld, R., Kelsey, R.M., & Critelli, J. (1994). Object relations of sexually abused female subjects: A TAT analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 223–228.
• Ordnuff, S.R., & Kelsey, R.M. (1996). Object relations of sexually and physically abused female children: A TAT analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 91–105.
• Parker, K.C.H., Hanson, R.K., & Hunsley, J. (1988). MMPI, Rorschach, and WAIS: A meta-analytic comparison of reliability, stability, and validity. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 367–373.
• Parker, K.C.H., Hunsley, J., & Hanson, R.K. (1999). Old wine from old skins sometimes tastes like vinegar: A response to Garb, Florio, and Grove. Psychological Science, 10, 291–292.
• Peixotto, H.E. (1980). The Holtzman Inkblot Technique: Some new directions in inkblot testing. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 2, 47–52.
• Perez, F.I. (1976). Behavioral analysis of clinical judgment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 711–718.
• Perry, G.G., & Kinder, B.N. (1990). The susceptibility of the Rorschach to malingering: A schizophrenia analogue. In C.D. Spielberger & J.N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment, Volume 9 (pp. 127– 140). Hilldale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
• Perry, W., Geyer, M.A., & Braff, D.L. (1999). Sensorimotor gating and thought disturbance measured in close temporal proximity in schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 277–281.
• Perry, W., Moore, D., & Braff, D. (1995). Gender differences on thought disturbance: Measures among schizophrenic patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1298–1301.
• Perry, W., McDougall, A., & Viglione, D.J., Jr. (1995). A five-year follow-up on the temporal stability of the Ego Impairment Index. Journal of Per- sonality Assessment, 64, 112–118.
• Perry, W., & Viglione, D.J., Jr. (1991). The Ego Impairment Index as a predictor of outcome in melancholic depressed patients treated with tricyclic antidepressants. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 487–501.
• Pinkerman, J.E., Haynes, J.P., & Keiser, T. (1993). Characteristics of psychological practice in juvenile court clinics. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 11, 3–12.
• Piotrowski, C., & Belter, R.W. (1999). Internship training in psychological assessment: Has managed care had an impact? Assessment, 6, 381–385. Piotrowski, C., Belter, R.W., & Keller, J.W. (1998). The impact of “managed care” on the practice of psychological testing: Preliminary findings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 441–447.
• Piotrowski, C., & Zalewski, C. (1993). Training in psychodiagnostic testing in APA-approved PsyD and PhD clinical psychology programs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 394–405.
• Popper, K.R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. NY: Basic Books.
• Porcerelli, J.H., Thomas, S., Hibbard, S., & Cogan, R. (1998). Defense mechanisms development in children, adolescents, and late adolescents. Journal of Personality Assessment, 71, 411–420.
• Psychological Corporation (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Edition. Wechsler Memory Scale, Third Edition. Technical Manual. San Antonio: Author.
• Rabin, A.I. (1968). Projective methods: An historical introduction. In A.I.
• Rabin (Ed.), Projective techniques in personality assessment (pp. 3–17). NY: Grune-Stratton.
• Ricks, D., Umbarger, C., & Mack, R. (1964). A measure of increased temporal perspective in successfully treated adolescent delinquent boys. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 685–689.
• Riethmiller, R.J., & Handler, L. (1997a). Problematic methods and unwarranted conclusions in DAP research: Suggestions for improved research procedures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 459–475.
• Riethmiller, R.J., & Handler, L. (1997b). The Great Figure Drawing Controversy: The integration of research and clinical practice. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 488–496
• Roback, H. (1968). Human figure drawings: Their utility in the clinical psychologist’s armamentarium for personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 1–19.
• Ronan, G.F., Colavito, V.A., & Hammontree, S.R. (1993). Personal problemsolving system for scoring TAT responses: Preliminary validity and reliability data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 28–40.
• Ronan, G.F., Date, A.L., & Weisbrod, M. (1995). Personal problem-solving scoring of the TAT: Sensitivity to training. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 119–131.
• Ronan, G.F., Senn, J., Date, A., Maurer, L., House, K., Carroll, J., & van Horn, R. (1996). Personal problem-solving scoring of TAT responses: Known groups validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 641–653.
• Rorschach, H. (1921). Psychodiagnostics: A diagnostic test based on perception. NY: Grune & Stratton.
• Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.
• Rosenzweig, S., Fleming, E.E., & Clark, H.J. (1947). Revised Scoring Manual for the Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study. St. Louis: Saul Rosenzweig.
• Rossini, E.D., & Moretti, R.J. (1997). Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) interpretation: Practice recommendations from a survey of clinical psychology doctoral program accredited by the American Psychological Association. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 393– 398.
• Ryan, R.M. (1985). Thematic Apperception Test. In D.J. Keyser & R.C. Swetland (Eds.), Test critiques (Vol. 2, pp. 799–814). Kansas City, MO: Test Corporation of America.
• Schmidt, F.L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, metaanalysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173–1181.
• Schneider, G.B. (1978). A preliminary validation study of the Kinetic School Drawing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38 (11-A), 6628.
• Schretlen, D.J. (1997). Dissimulation on the Rorschach and other projective measures. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.; pp. 208–222). NY, NY: Guilford.
• Schwartz, N.S., Mebane, D.L., & Malony, H.N. (1990). Effects of alternate modes of administration on Rorschach performance of deaf adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 671–683.
• Schweighofer, A., & E.M. Coles (1994). Note on the definition and ethics of projective tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 51–54.
• Scribner, C.M., & Handler, L. (1987). The interpreter’s personality in Draw-A-Person Interpretation: A study of interpersonal style. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 112–122.
• Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental validity: A recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 12, 153–158.
• Sechrest, L., & Wallace, J. (1964). Figure drawings and naturally occurring events. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 42–44.
• Shaffer, T.W., Erdberg, P., & Haroian, J. (1999). Current nonpatient data for the Rorschach, WAIS-R, and MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 305–316.
• Sharkey, K.J., & Ritzler, B.A. (1985). Comparing diagnostic validity of the TAT and a new picture projection test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 406–412.
• Silverton, L. (1993). Adolescent Apperception Cards: Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
• Sines, L.K. (1959). The relative contribution of four kinds of data to accuracy in personality assessment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 483–492.
• Skinner, B.F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Smith, D., & Dumont, F. (1995). A cautionary study: Unwarranted interpretations of the Draw-A-Person Test. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 298–303.
• Solovay, M., Shenton, M., Gasperetti, C., Coleman, M., Daniels, E., Carpenter, J., & Holzman, P. (1986). Scoring manual for the Thought Disorder Index. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 12, 483–496.
• Soskin, W.F. (1954). Bias in postdiction from projective tests. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 69–74.
• Spangler, W.D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.
• Starr, B.J., & Katkin, E.S. (1969). The clinician as an aberrant actuary: Illusory correlation and the Incomplete Sentences Blank. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 670-675.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1986). Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills. NY: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
• Stricker, G. (1967). Actuarial, naïve clinical, and sophisticated clinical prediction of pathology from figure drawings. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 492–494.
• Stricker, G., & Gold, J.R. (1999). The Rorschach: Toward a nomothetically based, idiographically applicable configurational model. Psychological Assessment, 11, 240–250.
• Suinn, R.M., & Oskamp, S. (1969). The predictive validity of projective measures: A fifteen year evaluative review of research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
• Sundberg, N. (1977). Assessment of persons. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
• Sutherland, S. (1992). Irrationality: Why we don’t think straight! New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Swenson, C. (1957). Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 431–466.
• Swenson, C. (1968). Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings: Psychological Bulletin, 70, 20–44.
• Szondi, L. (1947). Experimentelle Triebsdiagnostik. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber. Tellegen, A., & Waller, N.G. (1994). Exploring personality through test construction: In S.R. Briggs & J.M. Cheek (Eds.), Personality measures: Development and evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 133–161). Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press.
• Tharinger, D.J., & Stark, K. (1990). A qualitative versus quantitative approach to evaluating the Draw-A-Person and Kinetic Family Drawing: A study of mood and anxiety disordered children. Psychological Assessment, 2, 365–375.
• Thomas, C.B., Jones, L.W., & Ross, D.C. (1968). Studies on figure drawings: Biological implications of structural and graphic characteristics. Psychiatric Quarterly Supplement, 42, 223–251.
• Thomas, G.V., Chaigne, E., & Fox, T.J. (1989). Children’s drawings of topics differing in significance: Effects on size of drawing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 321–331.
• Thomas, G.V., & Jolley, R.P. (1998). Drawing conclusions: A re-examination of empirical and conceptual bases for psychological evaluations of children from their drawings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 127–139.
• Tolor, A., & Digrazia, P.V. (1977). The body image of pregnant women as reflected in their human figure drawings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 537–538.
• Trowbridge, M.M. (1995). Graphic indicators of sexual abuse in children’s drawings: A review of the literature. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 22, 485–493.
• Vaillant, G.E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Boston: Little, Brown.
• Vane, J.R. (1981). The Thematic Apperception Test: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 1, 319–336.
• Vass, Z. (1998). The inner formal structure of the H-T-P drawings: An exploratory study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 611–619.
• Veiel, H., & E.M. Coles (1982). Methodological ambiguities of the projective technique: An overview and attempt to clarify. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 443–450.
• Viglione, D.J. (1999). A review of recent research addressing the utility of the Rorschach. Psychological Assessment, 11, 251–265.
• Viney, L.L., Aitken, M., & Floyd, J. (1974). Sel-regard and size of human figure drawings: An interactional analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 581–586.
• Wade, T.C., & Baker, T.B. (1977). Opinion and use of psychological tests. American Psychologist, 32, 874–882.
• Waehler, C.A. (1997). Drawing bridges between science and practice. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 482–487.
• Wagner, E.E. (1962). The use of drawings of hands as a projective medium for differentating neurotics and schizophrenics. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18, 208–209.
• Waldman, I.D. (1996). Aggressive boys’ hostile perceptual and response biases: The role of attention and impulsivity. Child Development, 67, 1015–1033
• Wanderer, Z.W. (1969). Validity of clinical judgments based on human figure drawings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 143–150.
• Watkins, C.E., Campbell, V.L., Nieberding, R., & Hallmark, R. (1995). Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 54–60.
• Wecshler, D. (1997). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
• Weiner, I.B. (1996). Some observations on the validity of the Rorschach Inkblot Method. Psychological Assessment, 8, 206–211.
• Weiner, I.B. (1997). Current status of the Rorschach Inkblot Method. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 5–19.
• Weiner, I.B. (1998). Principles of Rorschach interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Weiner, I.B. (1999). What the Rorschach can do for you: Incremental validity in clinical applications. Assessment, 6, 327–338.
• Weiner, I.B. (2000). Using the Rorschach properly in practice and research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 435–438.
• Weiner, I.B., Exner, J.E., & Sciara, A. (1996). Is the Rorschach welcome in the courtroom? Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 422–424.
• West, M.M. (1998). Meta-analysis of studies assessing the efficacy of projective techniques in discriminating child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 1151–1166.
• Westen, D. (1991). Clinical assessment of object relations using the TAT. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 56–74.
• Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K., Kerber, K., & Goodrich, S. (1985). Measuring object relations and social cognitions using the TAT: Scoring manual. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
• Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K.R., Gold, L., & Kerber, K. (1990). Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A Thematic Apperception Test analysis. Psychological Assessment, 2, 355–364.
• Westen, D., Ludolph, P., Block, M.J., Wixom, J., & Wiss, F.C. (1990). Developmental history and object relations in psychiatrically disturbed adolescent girls. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1061–1068.
• Westen, D., Ludolph, P., Lerner, H., Ruffins, S., & Wiss, C. (1990). Object relations in borderline adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 338–348.
• Westenberg, P.M., & Block, J. (1993). Ego development and individual differences in personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 792–800.
• Whitehead, W.C. (1985). Clinical dissertation making on the basis of Rorschach, MMPI, and automated MMPI report data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas.
• Wildman, R.W., & Wildman, R.W. II. (1975). An investigation into the comparative validity of several diagnostic tests and test batteries. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 455–458.
• Wilson, J.Q., & Herrnstein, R.J. (1985). Crime and human nature. NY: Simon & Schuster.
• Winch, R.F., & More, D.M. (1956). Does TAT add information to interviews? Statistical analysis of the increment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 316–321.
• Winter, D.G. (1973). The power motive. NY: The Free Press.
• Winter, D.G., John, O.P., Stewart, A.J., Klohnen, E.C., & Duncan, L.E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250.
• Winter, D.G., & Stewart, A.J. (1977). Power motive reliability as a function of retest instructions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45,436–440.
• Wolfner, G., Faust, D., & Dawes, R.M. (1993). The use of anatomically detailed dolls in sexual abuse evaluations: The state of the science. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 2, 1–11.
• Woltmann, A.G. (1960). Spontaneous puppetry by children as a projective method. In A.I. Rabin & M.R. Haworth (Eds.), Projective techniques with children (pp. 305–312). NY: Grune & Stratton.
• Wood, J.M., & Lilienfeld, S.O. (1999). The Rorschach Inkblot Test: A case of overstatement? Assessment, 6, 341–349.
• Wood, J.M., Lilienfeld, S.O., Garb, H.N., & Nezworski, M.T. (2000a). The Rorschach Test in clinical diagnosis: A critical review, with a backward look at Garfield (1947). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 395–430.
• Wood, J.M., Lilienfeld, S.O., Garb, H.N., & Nezworski, M.T. (2000b). Limitations of the Rorschach as a diagnostic tool: A reply to Garfield (2000), Lerner (2000), and Weiner (2000). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 441–448.
• Wood, J.M., Nezworski, M.T., Garb, H.N., & Lilienfeld, S.O. (in press). The misperception of psychopathology: Problems with the norms of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.
• Wood, J.M., Nezworski, M.T., & Stejskal, W.J. (1996a). The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A critical examination. Psychological Science, 7, 3–10.
• Wood, J.M., Nezworski, M.T., & Stejskal, W.J. (1996b). Thinking critically about the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach. A reply to Exner. Psychological Science, 7, 14–17
• Wood, J.M., Nezworski, M.T., & Stejskal, W.J. (1997). The reliability of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A Comment on Meyer (1997). Psychological Assessment, 9, 490–494.
• Wood, J M., Nezworski, M.T., Stejskal, W.J., & McKinzey, R.K. (in press). Problems of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach in forensic settings: Recent developments. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice.
• Worchel, F.F. & Dupree, J.L. (1990). Projective story-telling techniques. In C.R. Reynolds & R.W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Personality, behavior, & context (pp. 70–88). NY: Guilford.
• Zeldow, P.B., & McAdams, D.P. (1993). On the comparison of TAT and free speech techniques in personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 181–185